A full read of your book in under a day. See where readers lean in, where they stop reading, and the one thing to fix first.
In short: An AI beta reader reads your manuscript from the first page to the last and reports back the way a reader would, not the way an editor would: where attention rose, where it fell, and where someone would have closed the book. Slima sends several readers through the same draft and only marks something as a real problem when at least two of them stop in the same place on their own. Your first report is free when you create an account.
Most feedback is one polite paragraph. Slima reads every page, the way real readers do.
See where readers lean in and exactly where they stop reading, chapter by chapter.
Scores for pull, voice, pace and character, plus an editorial letter with one clear fix.
Five to eight readers, each with their own age, taste and reading history.
Your book is cleared after the report and never used to train a model.
The curve traces the rise and fall of attention across the whole book. Click any dip to jump straight to the passage that lost them.
Overall scores, real reader reactions in their own words, and an editorial letter that reads like the note a publishing house would actually write. Plus the single thing to fix first.
Each reader has a real taste: age, reading history, what they love and what loses them. Build your own and keep the same panel across every draft.
Readers reflect the real reading experience. Editors do the structured analysis. Both run on every draft.
Structure, character, pacing, prose, market, overall. Drawn from the working habits of 200+ senior editors.
Define a reader's taste, age, and history, then keep the same panel across every draft.
Your book is cleared from memory after the report and never used to train a model.
A human beta reader gives you a paragraph three weeks later, and it is usually kind. An AI beta reader gives you a position. It reads every chapter and hands back a map: the attention curve across the whole book, the paragraphs people skimmed, the chapter where someone would have put it down, and scores for pull, voice, pace and character. It is not telling you whether the book is good. It is telling you where the book loses people.
This is worth asking of any AI reader, because a model's default reaction is praise, and praise is worth nothing to you. Three things in Slima are built specifically against it:
It cannot tell you whether your book is worth writing. It will not defend a strange choice that happens to be the entire point of the book, and it does not know your genre's readers the way someone inside that community does. Treat the report as a map of where attention leaks, not as a verdict. The decisions stay yours, and the people who genuinely care about your work are still worth waiting for.
After a draft you can bear to reread, and before you send it to anyone whose time you cannot spend twice: an agent, a paid editor, the three friends who will read it once. Running one on a first draft mostly returns what you already knew. Running one before you query tells you which chapter is going to cost you.
“Slima's writing coach is right there when I need it and never gets in the way. Version control lets me revise freely, and offline writing with cloud sync means I never lose a thing. Writing used to be lonely — now there's company and a real sense of safety. Wait, you're telling me Beta Reader will actually read my draft and give feedback? (silently sobbing)”
Yes. A new account starts on a trial that includes one full reading report, and no card is required. After the trial, reports come with the paid plans; the free plan does not include monthly reports.
It is built so that it cannot. Empty praise is blocked at the word level for every reader, so each one has to point at a place in your book. And an issue only reaches your report when two readers stop at the same spot independently, so one agreeable reader cannot carry it.
The whole book. An attention curve only means something if it covers the first page through the last, and that is exactly the part most feedback skips.
Usually back within a day.
It is read once and cleared afterwards, and it is never used to train a model.
No, and be careful with any tool that claims it can. What it replaces is the waiting: you can find the chapter that loses people this week, instead of discovering it after you have spent three readers on it.
Your first report is on us. A full read, no card required, usually back within a day. Read once, then cleared.