AI 독자

Pick test type: full vs quick

약 2분 소요

Not every run needs the full treatment — sometimes you want a single answer like "does my opening hook?"

Slima AI Editor 5-dimension checklist — coverage is the key difference between Full and Quick test types

Two types

Full reading

  • Reads: all chapters you selected
  • Reports: 7 diagnostic sections + individual reader cards + editor letter + scoring
  • Cost: higher
  • Time: 10–30 min
  • Best for: post-draft, want full feedback

Quick reading

  • Reads: curated sample (chapter openings + key chapters)
  • Reports: 1–2 sections (opening diagnostic + overall score)
  • Cost: lower
  • Time: 1–3 min
  • Best for: quick sanity check / right after a revision

Switch

Set-up screen has a toggle chip:

[ Full ]   [ Quick ]

Default: Full.

When to use which

Full:

  • "Finished a draft, want full-spectrum review"
  • "Submitting soon, want to know what's missing"
  • "Second revision pass — does it actually feel different?"

Quick:

  • "Just revised the opening, want to know if it landed"
  • "Just want to know if readers will drop at Chapter X"
  • "Already ran Full; want to check if one dimension improved"

Related

Was this helpful?